Featured

Americas Civilian Army Armed With Their Wallets

Unhappy customers take their business to other companies when possible, whether it’s a haircut or a cruise ship. Americans, for the most part, are unhappy with China for multiple reasons. So, let’s take our business elsewhere. It won’t be easy at first, but as our demand for non-Chinese products increases, so will the supply. Made in America is our first choice, of course. Keep our hard-earned money circulating in this country.

We need to look for non-communist countries that we can work with. If the American consumer could stop buying from them, China’s economy would suffer. This is not my primary goal, and there is no telling what their response would be. I would prefer to see China start playing by the rules with its citizens and other countries and become a reliable international partner for everybody.

One way we could start to show our desire to work with other countries would be to require retailers to post the country of origin on product displays. As we walk down the aisle in a hardware store or beauty supply, we would see China, China, China. That could show the American consumer just how much comes from them. I want to think that this would inspire us to at least try to find products made in other countries. We need to do something. We can’t continue financing the growth of Communism when it is determined to overtake America, both economically and militarily. If China ever becomes the world’s wealthiest economy, it will use that wealth to force the rest of us to fall in line.

We don’t need an army of soldiers to fight this potential problem. We only need an army of American consumers to shop more wisely.

Education

Imagine how different our country would be today if parents were able to choose what school their children attended. Certainly a good percentage of students would have gone to a religious school where there would have been more focus on morality and far less focus on political correctness.

What Is Distrimation?

DISTRIMATION:

Distrimation is a word blended from two other words, distribution and information. Officially, it’s short for the “The Distribution of Information”. There was a notorious spy, Clyde Lee Conrad*, that believed the most valuable commodity is “information”. He makes a good point and if he’s even remotely close we need to be aware of who distributes this important commodity. If information is distributed by an organization with any kind of bias we should be suspicious of the source and especially suspicious of the data.

*Cylde Lee Conrad was found guilty of selling highly confidential NAT military information and was given a life sentence in a German prison where he died in 1998.

EGEM:

There are four highly influential outlets which most people rely on for their information: Education, Government, Entertainment, and Media. (EGEM)

EDUCATION:

75% of public school teachers are in Teacher Unions
https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/sass0708_043_t1s/asp

American Federation of Teachers – 100% to Democrats and liberal organizations
National Education Assn. – 96% to Democrats and liberal organizations
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=L1300

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES:

AFSME – 100% to Democrats and liberal organizations
American Federation of Government Employees – 91% to Democrats and liberal organizations
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?cycle=2017&ind=P04

State Department employees – 94% to Democrats
Health and Human Services – 94% to Democrats
Labor Department – 98% to Democrats
Education Department – 96% to Democrats
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?cycle=2017&ind=P04
http://www.fedsmith.com/2016/12/21/tallying-political-donations-from-federal-employees-and-unions/

Washington D.C. – Trump recieved 4% of the votes
Prince George County, Maryland – Trump recieved 8.4% votes
https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2016$off=0&elect=0&f=0

MEDIA:

Negative coverage towards President Trump
CNN & NBC – 93% Negative
CBS – 91% Negative
FOX – 52% Negative
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/colunists/kass/ct-trump-media-coverage-harvard-kass0521-2017519-column.html

Negative coverage Trump vs. Obama
Overall coverage on Trump – 80% Negative
Overall coverage on Obama – 40% Negative

Political Donations from journalists
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/10/17/2033/journalists-shower-hillary-clintion-campaign-cash